Showing posts with label trade war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trade war. Show all posts

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Preparing For A Less-Friendly World

At the recent G20 Summit in Korea, PM Lee Hsien Loong rightly called for the G20 group of nations to work together towards policy measures that will sustain global economic growth. Unfortunately, as the aftermath of the meeting showed, his urgings fell on deaf ears as the Americans went ahead with QE2 despite opposition from China, Brazil and others. It looked to me like 'every nation for itself' and the possible outcome would be some kind of 'Nash equilibrium' when it comes to the trade and currency war situations.

As I have written before, I believe that we are moving into an era of reverse globalisation where there will be more friction of various kinds between countries. Here in Singapore, based on public information, it would appear to me that the government's economic assumptions are still predicated upon the continuation of the old free-trade system that has started to unravel since the 2008 financial crisis, with only a change in leadership from the developed world to Asia. What I would hope to see from our government is first an acknowledgement that we could be going into a rough period in the international scene, followed by concrete policy measures to prepare for such a possibility.

Realistically, I don't expect any change in our national economic thinking any time soon. Neither the government nor the opposition parties appear to have considered the risks of the era of reverse globalisation, at least not publicly.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

$10.2 trillion problem in 2011

The Wall Street Journal has reported that the developed countries of the world will need to raise US$10.2 trillion in 2011 to finance their budget deficits as well as to repay maturing bonds issued previously.

Given that many investors are now aware of the fact that most of the developed countries' governments are bankrupt, and that China may be increasingly unwilling to buy such sovereign debt as a result on the ongoing currency and trade wars, this could mean another round of shocks to the global financial system next year. If investors fail to show up for those bond auctions, there will either have to be debt default or monetisation. In the US case, the outcome is already clear - the US Federal Reserve will act as the buyer of last resort, buying up US Treasury debt in order to monetise it. As for Europe, I am not sure what will happen, as national politics between the different EU nations are involved. Austerity measures aren't getting much traction so far given the scale of protests that are happening across the EU. So, perhaps the EU may also be tempted to monetise debt? Who knows?

Whatever the case may be, it will definitely mean more 'interesting' times for investors as governments get more and more interventionist.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Storm Clouds Over the Horizon

While the drumbeat of Singapore politics has become louder in recent months, I am of the opinion that the focus of the discourse has so far been too parochial. There are some of the storm clouds that I see over the horizon and that could have impact on Singapore within the next 5-10 years, but which has so far not been covered in the discourse.

In this article, I shall outline some of the issues that I think will have major consequences for the long-run viability of our country. Admittedly, since I don’t have the power to predict the future, these points are somewhat speculative, although I have done some homework in all areas.





Peak Oil

Some experts such as Dr. Colin Campbell and Prof. Kenneth Deffeyes have argued that global peak oil production had actually peak in 2005, based on current available data. Production of liquid fuels has kept up with demand so far due to other sources like coal-to-liquids and gas-to-liquids technology. While new ways will be found for extracting oil and gas, the fact that the Brazilians have to drill for oil more than 7 km below the earth's surface for their Tupi field shows that the era of cheap oil is over.

Peak oil will result in very high volatility in the crude oil market, as high oil prices triggers recessions in economies. Such recessions will bring down demand and thus prices for a while until recovery takes places, at which time prices move up again and the cycle repeats.

As high prices take its toll on the global economy, trade will be reconfigured as businesses seek to move their production closer to their customers in order to cut down on the distance over which they have to ship their goods in order to cut transportation costs. A preview of this happened in 2008 when some US manufacturers found that moving production from China back to the US or Mexico made a lot of sense when oil was over US$100 per barrel. Besides this, tourism will be affected as high fuel prices forces airlines to cut routes and ground planes, as had happened in 2008.

Since the Singapore economy is very dependent on trade and tourism, peak oil could have a very large negative impact on our livelihoods.

To make things worse, high fuel prices will definitely lead to higher food prices since we import almost all of our food from abroad, sometimes over long distances.

Resource Scarcity

Due to changes in the weather cycles (not anthropogenic global warming), global food production could consistently fall short of demand. This explains the current ‘land grab’ that many countries are engaging in over in Africa and South America, as previously covered by this blog. Furthermore, the availability of potash and phosphorous could also be constrained, resulting in lower fertiliser production.

In terms of other minerals, peak oil proponents like Richard Heinberg have argued that we will soon experience declines many key industrial commodities.

And let us not forget the issue of water scarcity. As covered by the National Geographic magazine in April 2010, water conflicts are starting to surface, especially in the Tibetan plateau (China and India) and the Nile region.

As resources get scarce, there could well be conflict between countries competing for those limited supplies to satisfy their own economic needs. Global cooperation will decline and the world will become more unstable, again not good for Singapore's economic model.

End of USD as Reserve Currency

If the US Federal Reserve continues current policy of debasing the USD, it could well only be a matter of time before confidence in the currency collapses and the world is forced to move to a new currency regime.

While I don’t claim to know what the likely impact of such a scenario will be for Singapore, the fact that our country is a large holder of US government debt makes the possibility of financial losses quite high should the USD lose its reserve currency status. What this means for us as citizens is that our CPF savings will suffer losses as well.

Besides this, since our independence, we have only had experience with a USD-based global currency system and nothing else. One could even argue that our economic policies were designed to take advantage of the global trade system made possible by the USD’s reserve currency role and the attendant global credit expansion cycle since the early 1970s. Once that changes, we will have to figure out how to adjust our economy to the new global architecture, and whether or not we will be up to the task remains to be seen.

War

That the US is in decline is by now quite obvious, except for people like Stratfor’s George Friedman. As we move toward a multi-polar world, there could actually be more instability, if the Hegemonic Stability Theory is correct. This is especially so as the world faces the reality of resource scarcity and there is heightened competition.

Besides this, based on historical analysis, some cycle theorists and market experts believe that we are now in a Kondratiev Winter, and some believe that major wars have to occur before the next upswing in the global economy. From a generational cycle perspective, John Xenankis of Generational Dynamics predict a war between China and the US.

If the world were to move into a period of conflict, it would again mean that Singapore’s economy will be affected, since we depend on peace for our economic model to work.

Conclusion

Since this article is about threats to Singapore, I have not covered the more optimistic factors that will affect our future (e.g. Asia’s rising economic power etc). What I hope is that more Singaporeans will take a look at these possible threats and make preparations to deal with them in whatever way they can, and of course, pray that they don’t come to pass.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Korea Considers Capital Controls

In a move that appears to bolster my belief that the boom in the emerging market economies and stock markets are due more to the US Federal Reserve's quantitative easing rather than improvements in the global macroeconomic fundamentals, South Korea is reportedly considering measures to curb capital inflows, as reported by the Chinese edition of FT.

韩国透露了实施一系列新的资本管制措施以应对投资流动激增的可能性。

这意味着亚洲第四大经济体可能采取与巴西、泰国和印尼相似的防御性政策。


The full article can be found here.

And as a further sign that the underlying structural problems in Europe has not been addressed, let alone resolved, budget talks in Portugal aimed at implementing austerity measures to satisfy the bond market have made little headway so far.

Now that the US Fed is expected to announce a new round of quantitative easing, we need to watch to see what impact that policy will have on stock markets. We live in very interesting times indeed.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

China Does The Trade War Thing

Overnight, news came that China was halting exports of rare-earth minerals to Western countries, sending stocks like Molycorp up sharping on a day when the broader market got killed. This appears to be yet another salvo in the ongoing power struggles between China and the West.

The excuse that China typically uses for such moves is that it needs the minerals for its own fast growing industrial usage, which sounds plausible prima facie. The irony here is that China's own aggressive acquisition of overseas resources makes it vulnerable to such stunts being pulled by other countries as well, especially given the current trend towards resource nationalism. The Chinese would probably not be amused if say the US decides that it needed more wheat and soy meal for 'its own use', given the lack of supplies in the market currently. There's a difference between people not having enough to eat and them not being able to buy an iPad due to component shortages.

Perhaps that's why China is busy building up its blue-ocean capabilities, so as to be able to project power far away from its shores in order to get the resources it needs to sustain its increasingly expectant people. The risk of them 'running into' the US Navy is definitely on the rise.

己所不欲,勿施于人 - 《论语·颜渊篇》

Friday, October 1, 2010

Currency wars

Mexico is the latest country to complain of a strong exchange rate by selling US$600 billion worth of USD options, following loud protests from Brazil. Amongst the developed countries, the EU, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland have all either tried to talk their currencies down or intervened in the FX market to try to weaken their currencies. The reason for such sentiments is plain - everyone wants to export their way out of recession and into economic growth, and with China's exchange rate pegged to the USD, the fear of losing even more market share to China is driving many countries to try to devalue their currencies.

Since balance of payments must always balance on a global basis, it is impossible for everyone to achieve a balance of trade surplus without someone willing to run a deficit. That someone used to be the United States, but since the start of the global financial crisis, Americans have either been unable or unwilling to continue to play this role.

We live in a strange world indeed. In the papers, we read about an economic recovery, but then we also notice that countries are all complaining about strong currencies. 1 side of this story is not true. Which side would you believe?

Looking at things as they are now, if the global economic situation deteriorates further, currency wars could escalated into full-fledged trade wars between nations. One possible trigger could be the US-China row over the RMB exchange rate issue. That may trigger the start of a new wave of protectionism. Sounds a little like what happened in the 1930s, doesn't it?